Comités américains : Différence entre versions
Sauter à la navigation
Sauter à la recherche
Ligne 1 : | Ligne 1 : | ||
* Eiseman, Elisa, ''The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: Contributing to Public Policy'', 2003, Rand Corporation Publisher. | * Eiseman, Elisa, ''The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: Contributing to Public Policy'', 2003, Rand Corporation Publisher. | ||
+ | : Details goverment, private, and international response to the policy recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * Bioethics and Moral Content: National Traditions of Health Care Morality : Papers Dedicated in Tribute to Kazumasa Hoshino | ||
+ | De Hugo Tristram Engelhardt, H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr., Kazumasa Hoshino, Lisa M. Rasmussen | ||
+ | Collaborateur Hugo Tristram Engelhardt, H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr., Lisa M. Rasmussen | ||
+ | Publié par Springer, 2002 | ||
+ | |||
: Is there only one bioethics? Is a global bioethics possible? Or, instead, does one encounter a plurality of bioethical approaches shaped by local cultural and national traditions? Some thirty years ago a field of applied ethics emerged under the rubric "bioethics". Little thought was given at the time to the possibility that this field bore the imprint of a particular American set of moral commitments. This volume explores the plurality of moral perspectives shaping bioethics. It is inspired by Kazumasa Hoshino's critical reflections on the differences in moral perspectives separating Japanese and American bioethics. The essays include contributions from Hong Kong, China, Japan, Texas, the United States, Germany, Switzerland, and Italy. The volume offers a rich perspective of the range of approaches to bioethics. It brings into question whether there is unambiguously one ethics for bioethics to apply. | : Is there only one bioethics? Is a global bioethics possible? Or, instead, does one encounter a plurality of bioethical approaches shaped by local cultural and national traditions? Some thirty years ago a field of applied ethics emerged under the rubric "bioethics". Little thought was given at the time to the possibility that this field bore the imprint of a particular American set of moral commitments. This volume explores the plurality of moral perspectives shaping bioethics. It is inspired by Kazumasa Hoshino's critical reflections on the differences in moral perspectives separating Japanese and American bioethics. The essays include contributions from Hong Kong, China, Japan, Texas, the United States, Germany, Switzerland, and Italy. The volume offers a rich perspective of the range of approaches to bioethics. It brings into question whether there is unambiguously one ethics for bioethics to apply. | ||
Version du 24 septembre 2008 à 09:47
- Eiseman, Elisa, The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: Contributing to Public Policy, 2003, Rand Corporation Publisher.
- Details goverment, private, and international response to the policy recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
- Bioethics and Moral Content: National Traditions of Health Care Morality : Papers Dedicated in Tribute to Kazumasa Hoshino
De Hugo Tristram Engelhardt, H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr., Kazumasa Hoshino, Lisa M. Rasmussen Collaborateur Hugo Tristram Engelhardt, H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr., Lisa M. Rasmussen Publié par Springer, 2002
- Is there only one bioethics? Is a global bioethics possible? Or, instead, does one encounter a plurality of bioethical approaches shaped by local cultural and national traditions? Some thirty years ago a field of applied ethics emerged under the rubric "bioethics". Little thought was given at the time to the possibility that this field bore the imprint of a particular American set of moral commitments. This volume explores the plurality of moral perspectives shaping bioethics. It is inspired by Kazumasa Hoshino's critical reflections on the differences in moral perspectives separating Japanese and American bioethics. The essays include contributions from Hong Kong, China, Japan, Texas, the United States, Germany, Switzerland, and Italy. The volume offers a rich perspective of the range of approaches to bioethics. It brings into question whether there is unambiguously one ethics for bioethics to apply.