UK Biobank, consultations - 2000-2003 : Différence entre versions
Sauter à la navigation
Sauter à la recherche
Ligne 13 : | Ligne 13 : | ||
====articles critiques==== | ====articles critiques==== | ||
* Barbour, Virginia, 2003. [http://www.lancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(03)13377-6/fulltext "UK Biobank: a project in search of a protocol?"] ''The Lancet'' 361: 1734-1738. | * Barbour, Virginia, 2003. [http://www.lancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(03)13377-6/fulltext "UK Biobank: a project in search of a protocol?"] ''The Lancet'' 361: 1734-1738. | ||
− | *Petersen, Alan, 2007. [" 'Biobanks engagements: engendering trust or engineerinf consent?"] Genomics, Societry and Policy 3 (1): 31-43. | + | *Petersen, Alan, 2007. [http://www.hss.ed.ac.uk/genomics/documents/APGSPVol3No12007.pdf "'Biobanks engagements: engendering trust or engineerinf consent?"] Genomics, Societry and Policy 3 (1): 31-43. |
---- | ---- | ||
Revenir vers la section [http://ethiquedessciences.com/wiki/La_genomique La participation par grands dossiers - La génomique] | Revenir vers la section [http://ethiquedessciences.com/wiki/La_genomique La participation par grands dossiers - La génomique] |
Version du 2 mars 2009 à 16:02
Contexte
- Les documents parlementaires:
House of Lords, Science and Technology Committee, Second Report, session 1999-2000: demande de débat public House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee, Third Report, session 2002-2003: insuffisance du débat
Processus
articles critiques
- Barbour, Virginia, 2003. "UK Biobank: a project in search of a protocol?" The Lancet 361: 1734-1738.
- Petersen, Alan, 2007. "'Biobanks engagements: engendering trust or engineerinf consent?" Genomics, Societry and Policy 3 (1): 31-43.
Revenir vers la section La participation par grands dossiers - La génomique